LAMDA’s now Open Letter to our Attorney General and Treasurer of the Law Society – regarding Oshawa Courthouse incident of Jan 23 2026

***

Note at the end of this entry the response received from the LSO’s Treasurer, Peter Wardle, on Feb 24, 2026

The entry below up to that point was first posted on February 12th, referencing our Feb 5th letter, and was updated on Feb 18, and again today, Feb 24, 2026.

***

___________________________________________________________________________________

One week ago today, on Thursday, February 5, 2026, the Law and Mental Disorder Association wrote to Ontario’s Attorney General Doug Downey, Deputy Attorney General Randy Schwartz and the Treasurer of the Law Society of Ontario, Peter Wardle, asking what is being done for the defence bar in the wake of this incident.

To support us through this period where so many of our members, women and racialized defence lawyers and in particular racialized women defence lawyers, are struggling with the seriously unsettling, broad and deep adverse impact of what has been reported.

On that same date, we had become aware that MAG very appropriately was acknowledging the harms to racialized staff in the Criminal Division, although nothing was said specifically about women in at least the widely circulated email communication we have reviewed. Various avenues were identified for supports government staff could access if they were triggered by the allegations of physical assault of Sudine Riley, a Black woman criminal defence lawyer, by Durham Regional Police officers at the Oshawa Courthouse.

We were keen to hear how our government or our governing body was planning to support us.

We’ve waited a full week and despite requesting that our correspondence be minimally acknowledged, we have not had the favour of any reply from any of the addressees.

This is neither different nor less than expected.

Equally, it is neither intended nor anticipated that opening our letter to make it public, will trigger any response.

What I hope it will do, however, is to put a very fine point on what some systemic factors may be contributing to courthouse dynamics and policing culture that conceive of defence lawyers as less worthy of respect than our counterparts prosecuting for the State.

I’ll leave it to the reader to continue to unpack what link systemic factors like this may have to incidents as devastating as the circumstances of Jan 23 2026 that Sudine Riley alleges.

You can access LAMDA’s letter here:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/10a9MQ1bXBzLMk6cdeJgmmlyFSI8pO1DL/view?usp=drive_link

We won’t hold our breaths, but should LAMDA receive any response, we promise to publish it here fully in fairness to all those concerned.

***

POSTSCRIPT

My Feb 18 2026 LinkedIn Post updates on the situation, in context, and this is what it says in case you can’t link to it readily.

View Anita Szigeti’s  graphic link

Anita SzigetiAnita Szigeti • YouVerified • You Principal Lawyer at Anita Szigeti AdvocatesPrincipal Lawyer at Anita Szigeti Advocates 42m •

42 minutes ago • Visible to anyone on or off LinkedIn

What a time to be alive if you’re an Ontario Crown attorney with judicial aspirations. Yesterday Doug Downey appointed another five judges to the Court of Justice, all from various Crown’s offices — and once again, absolutely predictably based on recent history, none from the defence side of the aisle.

No doubt worthy appointments on their own individual merit, and congratulations to all.

That said, this persistence in favouring the “hiring” of “like-minded” judges as our Premier has said, is fueling the differential treatment of State vs Defence across the administration of justice. It continues to signal that prosecutors deserve the respect denied to the defence. Reinforces that this discrimination is justified.

And then we wonder why defence lawyers report being beaten by police acting as security in our courthouses. If consistent messaging from our government continues to dismiss an entire class of lawyers within the profession as less worthy, perhaps even worthless, the logical end result is open season on us.

Indeed when that report of the alleged assault at the courthouse came to light, the only concern we know our Attorney General apparently had was to ensure that Crown attorneys were supported in the wake of that troubling incident. Again, a commendable concern, but it is increasingly clear to those of us in defence, that we simply do not matter or count.

Still no answer from anyone, despite following up.

***

THE LAW SOCIETY OF ONTARIO RESPONDS ON FEB 24 2026

Screenshot
Unknown's avatar

About Anita Szigeti

• Called to the Bar (1992) • U of T Law grad (1990) • Sole practitioner (33 years) • Partner in small law firm (Hiltz Szigeti) 2002 - 2013 • Mom to two astonishing kids, Scarlett (20+) and Sebastian (20-) • (Founding) Chair of Mental Health Legal Committee for ten years (1997 to 2007) * Founding President of Law and Mental Disorder Association - LAMDA since 2017 * Founder and Secretary to Women in Canadian Criminal Defence - WiCCD - since 2022 • Counsel to clients with serious mental health issues before administrative tribunals and on appeals • Former Chair, current member of LAO’s mental health law advisory committee • Educator, lecturer, widely published author (including 5 text books on consent and capacity law, Canadian civil mental health law, the criminal law of mental disorder, a law school casebook and a massive Anthology on all things mental health and the law) • Thirty+ years’ experience as counsel to almost exclusively legally aided clients • Frequently appointed amicus curiae • Fearless advocate • Not entirely humourless
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a comment