Law Society of Ontario Benchers Hold a LOT of Power

In the wake of the release of the O’Connor Report, I thought I’d have a little closer look – all right, my first ever look, at what we can glean from the Society’s website about what they do there exactly and just who is doing it.

I was spurred into action by yet another public post on the LSO crisis by Tax Lawyer Carl Irvine who has followed this story closely.

Here is the post that piqued some new interest

https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:7311214876662591490/

This post concludes by noting that although “both Horvat and Miles are gone, [the other involved] benchers continue to hold important positions at the LSO.” He then sets out examples of ongoing involvement of the named members of the Compensation Committee on important Committees of Convocation. Mr. Irvine concludes: “These are roles which require benchers to exercise the kind of diligence that these benchers singularly failed to exercise in this fiasco. What confidence can we have in them? Who oversees a governance fiasco like this and stays in role?”

This is what started me down the rabbit hole of trying to navigate LSO’s Website here:

https://lso.ca/home

Here is what I found and could not find.

All LSO Bylaws are very readily available online here: https://lso.ca/about-lso/legislation-rules/by-laws

The Composition of Committees identifying the Benchers and others who sit on them is easily located here:

https://lso.ca/about-lso/governance/committees

I have been unable to find any description of the role or mandate of any of the Committees. With that said, I believe the Proceedings Authorization Committee determines which complaints / investigations / prosecutions proceed to tribunal hearing – I could be wrong.

Although with further digging, in the What’s new for 2025 section of the “Initiatives” Tab I found this summary of the PAC: “PAC is appointed by Convocation to review all complaints about licensees referred to it to determine which action available to it under the By-Laws should be taken. These include authorizing a conduct, capacity or competence proceeding or taking remedial action where prosecution is not an appropriate response.” Here: https://lso.ca/about-lso/initiatives/consultation-expanded-remedial-outcomes-for-the-p

Of Particular Interest, apart from the 6 person Restaurant Working Group (which is a favourite as all links to the “Osgoode Restaurant” simply inform it is permanently closed), are the following Committee member roles.

I’ve highlighted a few places where the Compensation Committee’s lawyer bencher members continue to serve today.

Compensation

Peter Wardle (Chair)
Sarah Letersky
Kevin Ross
Megan Shortreed
Sidney Troister

Proceedings Authorization

Megan Shortreed (Chair)
Laura Emmett
Michelle Lomazzo
Doug Wellman
Matthew Wilson
Michael Winward

Governance Review Task Force

Geneviève Painchaud (Co-Chair)
Peter Wardle (Co-Chair)

Rebecca Durcan
Pam Hrick
Mitchell Kitagawa
Michelle Lomazzo
William McDowell
Sonia Ouellet
Hassan Pirnia
Kevin Ross
Megan Shortreed
Stephen Rotstein

Audit & Finance

Sidney Troister (Chair)
Heather Hansen (Vice-Chair)

Mark Surchin (Vice-Chair)
Sean Aylward
Laura Emmett
Shalini Konanur
Howard Levitt
Hassan Pirnia
Michael Radan
Stephen Rotstein
Megan Shortreed
Trevor Townsend

Unknown's avatar

About Anita Szigeti

• Called to the Bar (1992) • U of T Law grad (1990) • Sole practitioner (33 years) • Partner in small law firm (Hiltz Szigeti) 2002 - 2013 • Mom to two astonishing kids, Scarlett (20+) and Sebastian (20-) • (Founding) Chair of Mental Health Legal Committee for ten years (1997 to 2007) * Founding President of Law and Mental Disorder Association - LAMDA since 2017 * Founder and Secretary to Women in Canadian Criminal Defence - WiCCD - since 2022 • Counsel to clients with serious mental health issues before administrative tribunals and on appeals • Former Chair, current member of LAO’s mental health law advisory committee • Educator, lecturer, widely published author (including 5 text books on consent and capacity law, Canadian civil mental health law, the criminal law of mental disorder, a law school casebook and a massive Anthology on all things mental health and the law) • Thirty+ years’ experience as counsel to almost exclusively legally aided clients • Frequently appointed amicus curiae • Fearless advocate • Not entirely humourless
This entry was posted in LAW SOCIETY OF ONTARIO, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Law Society of Ontario Benchers Hold a LOT of Power

  1. Pingback: The Law Society Wants to Hear from You (sort of) – Make sure your comments are received by Convocation ASAP | anitaszigeti

  2. Pingback: Justice in Pieces – The Law Society CEO Salary Scandal April 30 2025 | anitaszigeti

Leave a comment